Conversations in the Abyss by Michael Brookes

Conversations in the Abyss by Michael Brookes(Cover picture courtesy of The Yellow-Haired Reviewer.)

Stealing Lazarus’s miracle gifted him immortality. Combined with his natural ability of invading and controlling people’s minds this made him one of the most dangerous people on Earth.

But the miracle came with a price. His punishment was to be imprisoned within the walls of an ancient monastery and tormented by an invisible fire that burned his body perpetually. To escape the pain he retreated deep into his own mind.

There he discovers the truth of the universe and that only he can stop the coming Apocalypse.

[Full disclosure: Michael Brookes sent me a free ebook in exchange for an honest review.]

I didn’t really like Conversations in the Abyss as much as I liked the first book in The Third Path trilogy, The Cult of Me.  Not because it’s a bad book, but because it’s a completely different tone than the first book.  I’d be lying if I said I hated Conversations in the Abyss, but I’m definitely feeling more neutral toward this book.

Part of my problem seems to be, as I said, the change in tone.  Whereas the first book focused on the unnamed main character’s journey into evil and his subsequent saving of the world, this second book focuses more on the philosophical aspect of the coming Apocalypse.  It seems that the Church’s actions at the end of the first novel may have inadvertently made the Apocalypse come a little sooner, but that’s beside the point.  The point is that Michael Brookes is getting very philosophical in Conversations in the Abyss.  There’s an interesting origins story of Heaven and Hell and the fall of Lucifer and also some explanation for why God isn’t intervening in the world.  All from a Christian perspective, but it doesn’t get preachy.  Just philosophical and if you’re someone who likes philosophy like I do,  it’s fascinating.

Of course there’s some suspense and some amazing plot twists thrown in at the end, but there just wasn’t the kind of glued to the screen tension I felt in the first book.  If you’re someone that doesn’t mind slow but consistent plots, Conversations in the Abyss is great, but if you’re looking for the energy of the first book you may be a little disappointed.

The characters were okay in this installment, but nothing more.  From the brief glimpses we got of him, Pierre was a compelling Antichrist.  Our unnamed narrator changed a little bit because of his predicament, but there was more focus on the dialogue between himself and the fallen angel Venet than on his characterization.

I give this book 3.5/5 stars.


Leave a Reply