Category: Uncategorized

The Best and Worst of March 2015

I don’t know about you guys, but March just flew by for me.  We’ve been having beautiful weather here in general although we’re currently experiencing a bit of a snowstorm.  But then it’s supposed to be nice again by the end of next week, so I can’t really complain.  Things are generally going well for me and I’m super excited about Game of Thrones Season 5 premiering next Sunday (because I totally haven’t mentioned that before).

Stats-wise March was okay.  I received a total of 5,708 views with 3,549 of those being unique views.  That’s up from 5,169 views in February so things are looking up.  I expect as soon as Game of Thrones begins to get more hits than usual because of my SEO-heavy article (completely by accident, I assure you).  And here in April I’m hoping to do another Game of Thrones article as well as another Forgotten Figures article.  It’s been quite a while since I’ve done articles on either topic but I feel I’m ready to sink my teeth into both fantasy and history once more.

So what were some of the best articles this month?

1.  Why Girls Hate Game of Thrones—A Rebuttal

2.  How to Read 100 Pages in an Hour

3.  The Hunger Games and Ancient Rome

4.  The Mad Reviewer is Open to Review Requests (Temporarily)

5.  Why no Writer Wants to Tackle Chronic Pain

I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!  I can’t believe that the Game of Thrones article was once again #1.  But in all seriousness, I’m really not all that surprised with the top 5 articles this month.  I’m getting lots of links from class wiki pages on my Hunger Games article and my speed reading article has always been popular because it’s something a lot of people aspire to.  Maybe next month a new article will actually appear in the top 5.

What were the worst posts this month?

1.  The Return of the Weird Search Terms

2.  Discussion: Blogging Pet Peeves

3.  Sins of the Lost by Linda Poitevin

4.  The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova

5.  Crashed by Robin Wasserman

Meh.  Once again there are no real surprises here.  My reviews of Crashed and The Historian have appeared on the 5 worst list before and I’m sure they’ll appear on here again eventually.  They’re just not all that popular in terms of search engine traffic.  Which is fine because they’re definitely balanced out by the insane amount of search engine traffic I’m still getting on my usual top 3 posts.  As I’ve said before, they’re all pretty good books.  They’re just not that popular.

Well, that pretty much sums up my March.  How was yours?  Which articles of yours get the most search engine traffic?

My Least Favourite Book Tropes: Part Three

In parts one and two of this series I described some of the tropes that most annoy me and I’m going to continue in that griping tradition for part three.  It’s been a while since I’ve done one of these so I’m ready to start ranting!  The usual caveat applies: tropes are not necessarily clichés.  They’re just devices used by authors to tell a story but that doesn’t mean they don’t occasionally stray into the world of cliché.  Some of them annoy me but you, as a reader, may very well love these ones.  It all depends on the person.

Adults are Useless

1.  Adults Are Useless

This is very prominent in YA and in Children’s Fiction because the protagonists in these books are not adults.  So of course they see adults as hindering their progress on whatever mission they’re on rather than what the adults are actually doing: worrying about them.  Sometimes adults deliberately obstruct children’s or teen’s activities and it’s usually in the name of safety.  Other times they’re just being jerks, as every child or teen has found out at some point.

In some ways the trope makes sense—children and teens are more impressionable and more likely to adapt to events going on around them.  For example, if a child is telling an adult that there’s magic and lots of horrible things are happening because of it, then the adult is probably going to be useless and deny the whole thing.  It’s annoying but it’s at least believable.  When this trope is annoying is when all adults are useless, not just some.  That’s just unrealistic and a total caricature.  That’s somewhat expected in children’s fiction but when you’re reading YA it’s just patronizing, even if you are a teenager. Continue reading

Lazy Sundays: The Walking Dead Finale

Spoilers ahead!

Since I don’t analyze TV shows/movies as in-depth as I do books here are just some of my general thoughts on the finale tonight:

1.  I was convinced Glenn or Daryl were going to die for pretty much the entire episode.  I’m not sure why but knowing that Glenn is dead in the comics always makes me nervous when he’s in any sort of peril.

2.  Morgan’s back!  And he’s not crazy!  He’s oddly zen and I really hope that in Season 6 they go a bit into his backstory and we find out how he went from the total crazy person he was in ‘Clear’ to one of the more sane people in the finale ‘Conquer’.  Now that would be a story.

3.  I kind of want Michonne to take over Alexandria.  She’s got far more sense than Rick or Deanna.  Rick’s riding the crazy train right now and Deanna is probably going to get there after losing her husband and son in such a short period of time.  I don’t mean that Rick is as crazy as he was in the prison but he really does need to tone things down before he goes full Shane.

4.  Go Carol!

5.  Who are the Wolves?  And what’s their endgame?  They seem pretty messed up and I think they’ll be a major plot point in Season 6 but at the same time Scott Gimple has said that while people were the main threat in previous seasons, they won’t be in Season 6.  (That was in the letter Chris Hardwick read aloud on Talking Dead.)

Did you guys watch the finale?  Thoughts?

Reader Request Week 2015 #1: Reviewing Free Books

Emily Guido asked me:

I have a question about Author Drama. For one, I’m an Author, so any help I can get, I would love the advice. What I am dying to know is that if you have a book that you are reading for the pleasure of it, do you, for any reason, review it? Sometimes, the reviews I get are from people who pick up my book on a “Free” download time on Amazon. They say, I didn’t mean to read this book, but… yadda, yadda, yadda.

I do the same also. I pick up free books and even though I was never asked to review, I feel compelled to review them. Sometimes the Author gets upset if my review is not pleasing to them. It puts me in an uncomfortable area.

First off, I think the rules are a little bit different for author-reviewers because you have to deal with your fellow authors but I’ll talk about my experience with the problem.

To answer the question, yes.  Sometimes I download free books off of Amazon and review them.  Usually it’s because I really did enjoy the book and found it surprisingly good so I want to let my readers know about it.  I think that’s part of why authors put their books out for free on sites like Amazon: they think readers will accidentally stumble across them, like them and review them, thereby generating more publicity for their book so they are more likely to pay for subsequent novels.  That explanation makes the most sense to me and it’s one of the more common reasons authors tend to cite for putting their work out there for free.

But what happens when you don’t like a book?

Well, this depends largely on a) your personality and style of blogging and b) the book and author.

To start with a) I’d have to say that if you have a policy of reviewing most of the books you read like I do, feel free to leave a review.  However, this leads to the second part of the problem: the book and the author.  My general policy is that if the author puts one of those “please give me a review” blurbs either in the front or back of their book then it’s perfectly fine to leave a negative review.  If they’re asking for feedback, one-star reviews are feedback and if it’s your honest opinion there’s nothing wrong with writing one.

But if the author does not have an appeal for reviews or some such thing, I’d leave it up to your discretion.  Do you feel comfortable leaving a negative review if it’s not asked for?  I personally do in most situations (there are obviously exceptions) but if you’re not 100% comfortable with that, then don’t.  As I said, there’s nothing wrong with leaving a review, positive or negative, as long as it really is your honest opinion.  Some people feel differently.  Basically, it depends on you.  There is no easy answer to it.

To address the last point in Emily’s question, if the author throws a hissy fit over a negative review, that’s their problem and not yours.  They put their work out there to be read and judged by the public; they should expect to get less than flattering reviews at some point.  Again, as long as it’s your honest opinion about the book and you’re not author bashing, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it.

So basically?  There is no easy answer.  It really depends on what you’re comfortable with.

Discussion: Author Drama

It’s sort of known that in the book blogging community, at one time or another you are going to have author drama.  You can be the nicest, sweetest, most agreeable person ever and an author is pretty much guaranteed to attack you for one perceived slight or another.  It’s unfortunately inevitable, particularly if you’re like me and accept books from self-published authors, who are disproportionately responsible for author drama.  You can read of my experience with one such person here.

What I want to know is this: Have you, as a book blogger ever experienced author drama?  What happened?  Or, if you’re an author that does book reviews, have you ever been attacked by a fellow author?  Or, somewhat worse, if you’re an author that doesn’t review books have you ever been attacked by another author for a different reason?

Don’t name names here if you’re not comfortable doing so but I’d appreciate it if everyone would share their experiences.  The majority of author-blogger interactions are perfectly fine and even friendly but sometimes bad eggs crop up.  It’s unfortunately part of reviewing books online and I in no way mean to insinuate that only authors initiate drama; plenty of book reviewers do the exact same thing.