The Grass Crown by Colleen McCullough

The Grass Crown by Colleen McCullough(Cover picture courtesy of The Incurable Bluestocking.)

Throughout the Western world, great kingdoms have fallen and despots lay crushed beneath the heels of Rome’s advancing legions.  But now internal rebellion threatens the stability of the mighty Republic.  An aging, ailing Gaius Marius, heralded conqueror of Germany and Numidia, longs for that which was prophesied many years before: an unprecedented seventh consulship of Rome.  It is a prize to be won only through treachery and with blood, pitting Marius against a new generation of assassins, power-seekers and Senate intriguers—and setting him at odds with the ambitious, tormented Lucius Cornelius Sulla, once Marius’s most trusted right-hand man, now his most dangerous rival.

It goes without saying that we get to see things from the POVs of our old favourite characters Marius and Sulla but I for one welcomed the introduction of other characters.  Livia Drusa was a fantastic female character and her situation really gave me more insight into the plight of aristocratic women in Rome.  And of course who can forget the precocious young Gaius Julius Caesar, who is feared by Marius because of old Martha’s prophecy that he would surpass his uncle?  As with how it actually happened, Marius’s declining health and mental state led to Sulla’s meteoric rise up the ranks of the Roman hierarchy.  The way Colleen McCullough chose to tell the story was very telling: Marius, whose star is fading, receives very little page time while Sulla takes the main stage.

While I can see where this new expanded set of characters might confuse some readers, if you’ve read The First Man in Rome you’ll have no trouble following the many intrigues of The Grass Crown.  The Social War is sort of the main war in this book and it’s certainly not simplistic.  What fascinated me the most was the different approaches the many Senators took to the war and how they proposed to stop the Italian rebellion and discourage future rebellions.  Pompey Strabo Carnifex, true to his name (‘Pompey Cross-Eyed Butcher’ in English) was a truly horrible character that demonstrated the worst the patrician class had to offer.  There are just so many different, complex characters that if I start on them now this review will turn into an essay.

In essence the characters drive the story, whether they’re Roman or not since we get to see things from all points of view.  The plot is not fast-paced by any stretch of the imagination and yet Colleen McCullough’s writing is just too good to put down.  She truly cares about historical accuracy and her writing immerses you in the cutthroat world of ancient Rome.  From the halls of the Senate to the blood-soaked streets of Rome all the way to the far east of the empire, you’ll feel like you’re really there with the characters watching the events play out.  And that, my friends, is a special talent very few writers possess.

With the end being such a cliffhanger I had no choice but to dive straight into the next book, Fortune’s Favorites.  Truly, Colleen McCullough has an addictive writing style.

I give this book 5/5 stars.

Amazon     Barnes and Noble     Goodreads

Professionalism and Book Blogging

I’ve had a lot of things on my mind lately, but the main one has been professionalism.  Both in real life and here on my blog if I’m perfectly honest.  In real life I wear my professionalism like armour because I am in a male-dominated industry with mainly male clientele.  I’ve found that I’ve been doing the same thing here on my blog although writing certainly isn’t male-dominated any longer.

Everyone has differing opinions about whether book bloggers should conduct themselves in professional or semi-professional manners, whether they should be charging for book reviews (good or bad) and whether unpaid bloggers like myself should have a certain degree of professionalism in their conduct.  (Especially when it pertains to our dealings with authors.)

As much as I wish I could sometimes, I have no control over the conduct of others.  But I have total control over my own.  So here are some thoughts on my complex relationship with professionalism:

Professional

1.  All dealings with authors are as professional as possible until I’ve developed some sort of rapport with them.

Basically, when an author contacts me for a review and my submissions are open I try to behave like I do at work with a client.  Once an author and I develop a certain rapport, it’s okay to be a little informal.  Would I behave as I do with my closest friends?  Of course not.  But there’s nothing wrong with a little teasing and banter as long as it’s mutual.  I’ve made some pretty awesome author friends that way: Diantha Jones, Andy Szpuk and Luciana Cavallaro just to name a few.

Objectivity

2.  My personal friendships with authors don’t affect my reviews.

As you guys have noticed the author friends I’ve mentioned here are ones I’ve given good reviews to previously.  Do I give them good reviews because I consider them internet friends?  No.  I’d give my own late grandmother a bad review if I felt that her writing wasn’t up to snuff.  (As it just so happens, she wrote a beautiful memoir before she died and her writing is, in fact, excellent.)  Although it seems like a lot of authors have trouble with this concept I believe that generally the book and the author are separate.  Criticizing a book means you are criticizing someone’s work, not them personally.  It’s a thin line for some, but it’s a very important distinction from my point of view.

"Priorities" Road Sign with dramatic clouds and sky.

3.  Blogging is important to me, but it’s not my main priority.

While I like to think I do devote quite a bit of time to my blogging I’ve always acknowledged that while my blog is high on my priorities, it’s not my top priority in life.  I work six days a week and this winter I’m taking on even more work to help subsidize my trip to BEA 2015.  So are my posts always going to be super top quality?  No, but they’re going to be the best I can do at the time.  Will I be all caught up with my author review requests by Christmas?  Sadly, probably not.

And that’s why I’ll never call myself a professional blogger.  To be a truly professional blogger I’d have to dedicate far more time to my blog than I can at the moment.  20 hours a week is more than enough at this point so I’ll stick with my semi-professionalism.

Honesty

4.  Full disclosure to my readers is not something I will compromise on.  Ever.

Call it the wannabe journalist in me, but there is one thing I will never compromise on and that’s telling the truth.  If I received a book for free from an author in exchange for a review I’ll tell you at the beginning of said review.  If an author friend asks me if I can post about this upcoming special sale they’re having I will as long as I’ve read and enjoyed their previous work and add a caveat in the post.  If I’m posting for a blog tour, I’ll also let you know.  If I’ve personally approached an author asking if I can review their book, I’ll definitely let you know.

You guys, my readers, have the right to know where my books come from and what possible influences or biases I have.  That way you can decide for yourself whether to trust me or not.  I’ve been as transparent as possible on this blog and I really hope that shows.

Questions

So now I want to hear from you guys: What do you think of my tidbits about my own professionalism?  Do you share the same philosophies?  Do you disagree with some of the things I’ve said?  I’m genuinely curious here because professionalism is a pretty hot button topic within the reading and writing communities.  Please let me know in the comments below.

I’m Taking the Day Off Due to On/Off Power

Yep, it’s the first snowfall of winter here in my area of Saskatchewan so of course the power has been flickering on and off all day.  And yes, that’s why there’s no real post today.  So if I’m not around on Twitter or have not responded to comments, there’s a very good reason.  (But please keep up the comments on the latest discussion post!  They’re awesome.)

Have a nice Sunday!

Discussion: Your Favourite Historical Period

(This may seem a little non-book related, but I swear this is relevant.)

Personally I’d have to say my favourite period in history to study is ancient Egypt.  Compared to Western culture their civilization was so alien so I suppose there’s the whole exotic factor.  Yet at the same time I admire their determination as a culture to survive.  How many other civilizations pretty much collapse twice and come back stronger than ever?  That’s pretty admirable.  And there were so many interesting people to study.  Nefertiti, Nefertari, Ramses II, Kamose, etc.

At the same time, I absolutely love ancient Rome thanks to Mike Duncan’s awesome podcast The History of Rome.  There are much more reliable written records for Roman history than there are for much of ancient Egyptian history and I feel like I know the historical figures on a much deeper level.  Of course there’s the fact that I love studying ancient battle tactics and the Romans were always fighting someone.

As you guys have probably noticed, these periods in history are the ones I read about most frequently in historical fiction.  Coincidence?  Of course not.

So what I want to know is: What’s your favourite period in history?  Why?  Do you intentionally seek out historical fiction set in that period?

The Best and Worst of October 2013

Overall, I’d say October was a pretty awesome month for me.  In real life I got to scare children on two separate occasions and read some pretty awesome books.  Blog-wise I’m doing better than ever.  October 2013 has been my second best month of all time in terms of stats.  I have received 6,779 views and that includes 4,416 unique views.  My best month is still September 2012 when I received 6,927 views, but I’m very pleased with my progress.

So what were my best posts this month?  Let’s take a look:

1.  Why Girls Hate Game of Thrones—A Rebuttal

2.  The Hunger Games and Ancient Rome

3.  The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton

4.  Discussion: Blogging Pet Peeves

5.  The Giver by Lois Lowry

As my regular readers know, none of these are new except for my blogging pet peeves discussion post.  So why did I have so many views this month?  Well, looking at the number of hits on the article ‘Why Girls Hate Game of Thrones—A Rebuttal’ it’s almost six times the number of hits for the #3 slot.  The same goes for my Hunger Games article.  Game of Thrones, both the book series and the TV show, is still wildly popular so there’s no surprise there.  And the Catching Fire movie is coming out soon, so it’s not really all that surprising that that particular article is picking up.  The fact that The Hunger Games is a popular novel study book doesn’t hurt either.

Okay, so the best articles were pretty much my usual ones.  Which were the worst?

1.  Lady of Palenque: Flower of Bacal by Anna Kirwan

2.  Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl

3.  Genghis: Lords of the Bow by Conn Iggulden

4.  Awful Egyptians by Terry Deary

5.  Extras by Scott Westerfeld

This is the first time any book by Roald Dahl has appeared on my 5 worst list so it’s a landmark month in both the best and worst lists.  The other books are either older novels or were just plain unpopular even when they first came out.  Really, I’m not all that surprised by any of the ones on this list other than Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

In the spirit of Halloween, here’s a picture that sums up my most awesome day:

Carrie Pictures 2013 063This is at the end of a long 3 or so hours of scaring children.  I swear my hair looked better at the beginning of the local haunted house.  (For those of you that are curious I’m the dumb-looking redneck zombie on the right.  On the left is a bookish friend of mine that’s also a huge fan of The Walking Dead and scaring children.)